19 ms·

> Rude. If you need clarification to my statements, just ask. No need for snark. Fair enough, I apologize. >These are my opinions. I'm saying NATO countries s

> Rude. If you need clarification to my statements, just ask. No need for snark. Fair enough, I apologize. >These are my opinions. I'm saying NATO countries should pay what they agreed to or leave the agreement. I'm saying we shouldn't be in the Middle East. Yes, but we're discussing what the US is gaining from the European NATO partners, and not what your personal opinion on wars in the Middle East is. >It's not a gotcha, it's current events. The Ramstein base was brought up recently. Trump wanted to reduce troops, Merkel didn't like the idea. That's all. Uh. Ok. Sure. Don't forget the 1000 servings of Spatzle for Afghanistan refugees. That's another fact unrelated to the discussion. >Just because Trump was mentioned you don't have to bring up the propaganda like the bleach lie (he was talking about UV disinfectants). He talked about forest management to prevent wildfires (he's correct), which you simplify to raking forests. Please keep on track and don't diverge into petty stuff like that. Check your facts, I saw the clips, that's exactly what he said. [0] But sure, I'll refer to him as "twice-impeached serial sexual predator, adulterer, who would like to date his own daughter and who can reliably recognize the picture elephant on a test" instead. [0] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/19/make-america-rake-again-finland-trump-forest-fire https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/19/make-america...

hunterb123 5y ago
> Yes, but we're discussing what the US is gaining from the European NATO partners, and not what your personal opinion on wars in the Middle East is. When we agreed to it maybe that plus the agreed upon GDP 2%? percentage payment was the motivating factor. The point is those countries aren't paying the agreed upon amount. Maybe it's still worth it for that simple fact alone and that's why every politician other than Trump was okay with the status quo, because they support the endless wars. > Check your facts, I saw the clips, that's exactly what he said. [0] "Raking of forests" is a real practice and in general he was talking about clearing brush to prevent fires. This is what the machines that "rake" forests look like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_EZeAiy3ew https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_EZeAiy3ew > But sure, I'll refer to him as "twice-impeached serial sexual predator, adulterer, who would like to date his own daughter and who can reliably recognize the picture elephant on a test" instead. Acquitted both times because the impeachments were ridiculous. The other stuff you listed is ridiculous as well.
- nautilius 5y ago
  >Every politician other than Trump was okay with the status quo, because they support the endless wars. Oh, I didn't see him end wars. >"Raking of forests" is a real practice Ah, now it's raking of forests again, after you cried out that he never talked about raking but about 'forest management', a phrase I am sure never crossed his lips. But maybe, if you continue your research, you can come up with differences between Finland and California. > Acquitted both times because the impeachments were ridiculous. Impeached, period. But yes, now Putin's little puppet is praising the master again. > The other stuff you listed is ridiculous as well. Indeed. All on tape and video, for the whole world to hear and see. Never before was the head of a country made fun of by the whole planet. Never in the history of the UN was there another clown like this laughed at on stage, to his face. What an utter embarrassment and failure is that guy, that the whole world turns away from this cringe.
  - hunterb123 5y ago
    You're being hostile, especially with the name calling, much of what you said is inaccurate but I'm not going to interact with you further, have a good day.

hunterb123 5y ago

> Yes, but we're discussing what the US is gaining from the European NATO partners, and not what your personal opinion on wars in the Middle East is. When we agreed to it maybe that plus the agreed upon GDP 2%? percentage payment was the motivating factor. The point is those countries aren't paying the agreed upon amount. Maybe it's still worth it for that simple fact alone and that's why every politician other than Trump was okay with the status quo, because they support the endless wars. > Check your facts, I saw the clips, that's exactly what he said. [0] "Raking of forests" is a real practice and in general he was talking about clearing brush to prevent fires. This is what the machines that "rake" forests look like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_EZeAiy3ew https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_EZeAiy3ew > But sure, I'll refer to him as "twice-impeached serial sexual predator, adulterer, who would like to date his own daughter and who can reliably recognize the picture elephant on a test" instead. Acquitted both times because the impeachments were ridiculous. The other stuff you listed is ridiculous as well.

nautilius 5y ago
>Every politician other than Trump was okay with the status quo, because they support the endless wars. Oh, I didn't see him end wars. >"Raking of forests" is a real practice Ah, now it's raking of forests again, after you cried out that he never talked about raking but about 'forest management', a phrase I am sure never crossed his lips. But maybe, if you continue your research, you can come up with differences between Finland and California. > Acquitted both times because the impeachments were ridiculous. Impeached, period. But yes, now Putin's little puppet is praising the master again. > The other stuff you listed is ridiculous as well. Indeed. All on tape and video, for the whole world to hear and see. Never before was the head of a country made fun of by the whole planet. Never in the history of the UN was there another clown like this laughed at on stage, to his face. What an utter embarrassment and failure is that guy, that the whole world turns away from this cringe.
- hunterb123 5y ago
  You're being hostile, especially with the name calling, much of what you said is inaccurate but I'm not going to interact with you further, have a good day.