4 ms·
Its unclear to me. Some variants of hinduism have embraced this for ages. The underlying belief of vegetarianism in this culture is that animals are kin and ea
by pempem 5y ago
Its unclear to me. Some variants of hinduism have embraced this for ages.
The underlying belief of vegetarianism in this culture is that animals are kin and eaten only when survival is on the line. When there is choice (and there almost always is) you choose not to eat meat.
The part that I've found newly confounding is the 'thinking' of plants. Can't square that one. Thankfully there are a few studies debunking anything along the lines of sentience:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28875517/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28875517/
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00709-020-01579-w https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00709-020-01579-w
- exodust 5y agoThe "thinking" aspect of plants might be reclaimed in respect of the overall foundations of mother nature's connected biodiversity. As the maker of the octopus doco put it, the "giant biological mind". This interview is cued up at the point he mentions that: https://youtu.be/oyBqZ-_5B_8?t=587 https://youtu.be/oyBqZ-_5B_8?t=587 I think he makes a good point, it's a good reminder. It's a distraction when the argument becomes "plants can't think like humans". But why should plants need to think like us to be protected or respected? The point is, humans are crushing those precious ecosystems, all because individual plants can't think and fish have no feelings.