2 ms·
Anyone who insists on C89 is just talking nonsense. There are zero downsides to C99 and if you are using C89 you should not be.
by mlindner 5y ago
Anyone who insists on C89 is just talking nonsense. There are zero downsides to C99 and if you are using C89 you should not be.
- asveikau 5y ago~7 years ago you needed c89 to port to MS's compiler. But they brought some of that up to speed. I would not be surprised if there is some niche environment somewhere that needs c89. Not any mainstream desktop, server or phone though.
- yyyk 5y agoC99 added support for VLAs which are a mistake. Fortunately, Linux stopped using VLAs a while ago.