5 ms·
A perspective you don't share is ridiculous, so your explanation is "evil"? Maybe, it's more likely that you just don't understand it.
by Svettie 5y ago
A perspective you don't share is ridiculous, so your explanation is "evil"? Maybe, it's more likely that you just don't understand it.
- jacquesm 5y agoSure, that must be it. Russia has a perfect right to encroach on whatever territories border their nation because they can't handle having sovereign nations at their borders. And of course after that they get to do it again. No, it's ridiculous.
- Svettie 5y agoAgain, something being ridiculous (to you) does not make it evil. And your straw man has nothing to do with my response
- pcwalton 5y agoI'm happy calling initiating a completely preventable conflict that nobody wanted that has resulted in the deaths of 137, 17 of whom are Ukrainian civilians, and 316 wounded evil. There's no meaningful moral difference between what Putin did and outright murdering 17 people. He knew innocent Ukrainians (and, for that matter, innocent Russians) would die and didn't care.
- rayiner 5y agoWell that’s not how anything works. E.g. how many babies might be saved by Russian economic development from having access to the sea through Ukraine? At this scale the moral calculus isn’t easy.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- jacquesm 5y agoOf all the disgusting comments this really takes the cake. Russian economic development through war doesn't save Russian babies, it will kill them.
- rayiner 5y agoWar has led to plenty of development through history, and development saves babies. Do you think Italy or Germany would have been better off as bickering principalities, without Giribaldi or Bismarck? Do you think China would have been better off as a bunch of warring states?
- euroclydon 5y agoSo we got it wrong with the sanctions then. We should actually be providing economic stimulus to Russia right now
- rayiner 5y agoWe shouldn’t be economically sanctioning countries that aren’t threatening us directly. It causes tremendous suffering and death, e.g. in Iran: https://mcgillbusinessreview.com/articles/the-human-cost-of-economic-sanctions https://mcgillbusinessreview.com/articles/the-human-cost-of-...
- euroclydon 5y agoI agree on Iran but this is different. We could have sold steel and fuel to the Germans and Japanese in WW2, but we didn’t because they were engaged in something evil.
- rayiner 5y agoThe Germans were engaged in the holocaust, which was evil. The Russians are invading a sovereign country to replace the government, which the US has done twice in as many decades.
- jacquesm 5y agoMH17 ring a bell? Seriously done with Russia apologists for today.
- Svettie 5y agoCall me what you wish, but it's not true. If you're done then log off and stop spamming your replies to every single comment in this thread, and leave some space for any other opinion. You're just ranting
- jacquesm 5y agoI won't be told to shut up by you or anybody else for that matter, nine years on HN and this is what brings you out to comment with a bunch of disinformation? Pretty clear which side you are on.
- Svettie 5y agoThat's not the case. But anyway, after a night to clear my head I realize this is an emotional time for everyone, and I'm sorry for stirring you up. I was reacting to my own things. I definitely don't support this war, nor any further bloodshed. I wish for peace, and peace to you as well. Have a good day