3 ms·
If a company is 100% remote that’s one thing, but in any hybrid scenario those that consistently appear in an office will unavoidably be at a significant advant
by JCM9 5y ago
If a company is 100% remote that’s one thing, but in any hybrid scenario those that consistently appear in an office will unavoidably be at a significant advantage. Those informal coffee chats, grabbing lunch together and such are invaluable and it’s hard/impossible for someone on a screen somewhere to get the same benefits.
There will be those that dig their heels in hard but unless the company is 100% remote forever such stubbornness is likely a career limiting move.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- null_shift 5y agoIs there research that proves that in-person teams are more successful than remote/hybrid ones? If not, I think remote/hybrid employees should be equal class citizens to on-site employees, and that should be reflected in a consistent composition of those roles thru all levels of leadership.
- stkdump 5y agoI think the point GP is making is that hybrid Teams are worst off. And that was my experience also pre pandemic. Actually the people who always were remote felt a huge improvement, because suddenly all had the same 'distance' and needed to put in the same effort to stay connected.