4 ms·
I think the implication is that in a hybridized company the people who are there in-person will have a leg up on promotions over people who are fully-remote. I
by potatolicious 5y ago
I think the implication is that in a hybridized company the people who are there in-person will have a leg up on promotions over people who are fully-remote.
I think this is pretty obviously true - even though I don't endorse the state of affairs.
This is already true - even pre-pandemic those in remote offices far from HQ have a distinct advancement disadvantage vs. those who have face-time with senior leadership on the regular.
- PickledHotdog 5y agoAre in-house promotions even that common these days? A lot of people's career advancement involves switching jobs
- GekkePrutser 5y agoDepends on the company I guess. Where I work it's very common.
- bravetraveler 5y agoWhile I do agree there is a certain bias here, let me offer an anecdote... I've been remote for years prior to the pandemic. I've found more advancement since. It's certainly from a disadvantaged position, not to imply otherwise. I attribute this more to my employer and personality - if something is wrong/broken I make it known Being essentially on the speed dial for everyone and maintaining this image of vocal participant has helped mitigate this. Fix a couple incidents in stellar fashion and the C suite starts to love your Slack alias