> if a NATO member is attacked, then member states are obligated to come to the member's aid Are they really? > So while the use of armed force is one way to

> if a NATO member is attacked, then member states are obligated to come to the member's aid Are they really? > So while the use of armed force is one way to respond to aggression, the NATO has several options, for example: > Nothing. They might decide that the best way to "restore and maintain security" is to just let the attacker have that country. https://politics.stackexchange.com/a/32686 https://politics.stackexchange.com/a/32686