3 ms·
Whats good about arbitrary 100-900? I would think a float would have worked fine. The whole idea of different levels of boldness is not great anyhow. If you re
by jay_kyburz 5y ago
Whats good about arbitrary 100-900? I would think a float would have worked fine.
The whole idea of different levels of boldness is not great anyhow. If you really care you would use a spercific font to get the weight you want.
- xdfgh1112 5y agoPresumably when you have a specific font AND a specific weight in mind.
- oldstrangers 5y ago"If you really care you would use a specific font to get the weight you want." We do? That's why we have font families. Roboto Bold 700 -> font-family: 'Roboto', sans-serif; font-weight: 700;
- jay_kyburz 5y agoI would argue it would be better to use font: RobotoBold.ttf font: RobotoBlack.ttf font: RobotoThin.tff As they are named here. https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Roboto https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Roboto using Roboto 600 is meaningless and should be an error. Because the font designers have made specific decisions about how the font should change as it gets thinner or heavier. There is no continuum along which you can just choose how think you want the font. The numbers are meaningless noise.