4 ms·
The article links to "The PGP Problem" in an attempt to suggest that GPG signatures are bad somehow. Here are my comments on "The PGP Problem": * https://artic
by upofadown 5y ago
The article links to "The PGP Problem" in an attempt to suggest that GPG signatures are bad somehow. Here are my comments on "The PGP Problem":
* https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=pgpfan:tpp https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=pgpfan:tpp
The article also claims that Debian has moved away from GPG signatures. This is not true.
This all seems like a pointless distraction from the point that article is attempting to make...
- Wonderfall 5y agoThere is literally a link in the article that takes you to the Debian website: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Apt/Spec/AptSign https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Apt/Spec/AptSign I might rephrase that since they didn't technically moved away from OpenGPG (yet). It was a proposal at the time.
- Wonderfall 5y agoSorry, of course meant GPG, OpenPGP being the standard on which GPG is based on.
- southerntofu 5y agoThanks for this article, it makes very good points. In particular, about the UX of GPG, i've found Sequoia to be a very good alternative: https://sequoia-pgp.org/ https://sequoia-pgp.org/