4 ms·
There isn't one. I am not the person who was claiming there was, if that's what you're implying. Some people think that his words imply nuclear, but as it's no
by brabel 5y ago
There isn't one. I am not the person who was claiming there was, if that's what you're implying.
Some people think that his words imply nuclear, but as it's not directly mentioned, that's just one interpretation.
If you ask me, I think that means just some secret weapon pointed directly at whoever Putin believes may interfere... but no one really knows.
- anon_123g987 5y agoYou quoted the "wrong" part of the speech. Here it is, I highlighted for you: > As for military affairs, even after the dissolution of the USSR and losing a considerable part of its capabilities, today’s Russia remains one of the most powerful NUCLEAR states. Moreover, it has a certain advantage in several cutting-edge weapons. In this context, there should be no doubt for anyone that any potential aggressor will face defeat and ominous consequences should it directly attack our country.