6 ms·
I think this is mainly a psychological move. It has people talking about nuclear fallout, radiation etc. That's the point.
by injb 5y ago
I think this is mainly a psychological move. It has people talking about nuclear fallout, radiation etc. That's the point.
- moffkalast 5y agoIt does pose the question what would actually happen should someone bomb the sarcophagus.
- rocqua 5y agoUnless the prevailing winds are really blowing towards the west, this would harm Russia and their newly conquered territory much more than it would harm the EU. It makes more sense as a bargaining chip with Ukraine than as a chip with the EU.
- Lammy 5y agoThe most interesting part of Chernobyl to me isn't even the power plant, but what it was powering: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duga_radar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duga_radar
- qbasic_forever 5y agoYeah the site is a massive liability for whoever controls it. There's a ton of work left to do to fully decommission it and make it safe.
- spywaregorilla 5y agoWhat if, and bear with me, Russia doesn't care about safety?
- danuker 5y agoWell then, Russian soldiers and Belarus will see some nuclear fallout. Right now the wind is blowing North. https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/bio/surface/level/annot=fires/orthographic=-326.95,55.38,2353/loc=51.390,30.099 https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/bio/surface/level/anno...
- w0de0 5y agoAh, no, I believe it's primarily a purely tactical advance. Chernobyl is directly in the Russian army's shortest path of advance on Kyiv. If it turns out they don't try to take Kyiv, I stand corrected. But practical necessity has certainly not stopped the Russians from also trying an infowar attack based on Chernobyl's totemic power, as you say.