4 ms·

Say what you will about ActiveX, but it allowed a much more native feel for web pages.

• jraph 5y ago
  Native feel is not wanted (anymore). Branded appearance is. (and I think this is unfortunate. I wish developers didn't attempt to replace my browser's perfectly fine-looking, accessible checkboxes by their own often ugly custom implementations for instance. And I'm not hating on web devs, I'm one of them) XUL [1] seemed like a good idea as a basis for building native-looking web applications. It's too bad it has been abandoned. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XUL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XUL
  • ironmagma 5y ago
    I think both are wanted. People like it when they have the usability and familiarity of native widgets, but it’s nice when they also have theming and personality. A good example is TweetBot, which is a normal iOS app except it’s not, or OmniFocus which does things in a native way except everything is purple.
  • MaxBarraclough 5y ago
    > XUL seemed like a good idea as a basis for building native-looking web applications. It's too bad it has been abandoned. Didn't XUL do roughly what React Native, and other similar frameworks, do today? edit I see that XUL did its own rendering rather than using native widgets, but the overall goal seems about the same.