3 ms·
That's a bit naive. There are already hundreds of civilian casualties. The Russian shelling is not precise. They don't have the technology for that. They were u
by mlindner 5y ago
That's a bit naive. There are already hundreds of civilian casualties. The Russian shelling is not precise. They don't have the technology for that. They were using MLRS rockets which kill indiscriminately. There's a video circulating online of a little girl who got hit by a shell and killed. This is not like Crimea.
- coryfklein 5y ago> There are already hundreds of civilian casualties... This is not like Crimea. For those curious about the numbers, there were 2 soldiers and 1 civilian killed in the annexation of Crimea[0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Ru...
- CapricornNoble 5y ago>>>The Russian shelling is not precise. They don't have the technology for that. Nitpick: they absolutely have the tech for it. They were using laser-guided heavy mortar rounds in Afghanistan. https://community.apan.org/cfs-file/__key/docpreview-s/00-00-08-27-71/2005_2D00_12_2D00_01-The-High_2D00_Precision-Tulip_2D00_-Development-and-Combat-Employment-_2800_Grau-and-Litvenenko_2900_.pdf https://community.apan.org/cfs-file/__key/docpreview-s/00-00...
- _dw7s 5y ago> That's a bit naive. They're not being naive. This is a deliberate effort to downplay the events. Always keep in mind that a war is often fought with different types of weapons, including information.