3 ms·
> But it is always a con. I think you should rephrase that, because it's pretty insulting to researchers who have been working incredibly hard on taking steps
by Angostura 5y ago
> But it is always a con.
I think you should rephrase that, because it's pretty insulting to researchers who have been working incredibly hard on taking steps towards Fusion.
I think the phrase you were grasping for is: "I doubt it will ever be economically viable".
- ncmncm 5y agoThe con is in calling every last incremental improvement a "breakthrough". No, you didn't break through anything. The only upcoming breakthrough is the plasma eroding a hole in the chamber wall.
- pfdietz 5y agoBe fair. It's the relativistic electron beam from a disruption that's going to do that, not the plasma itself. :)