3 ms·
> this problem and issue that has very viable practical solutions and storage for a few hundred years is viable. So you mean to say that there is no practical
by boomlinde 5y ago
> this problem and issue that has very viable practical solutions and storage for a few hundred years is viable.
So you mean to say that there is no practical reason for fusion power to exist for as long as you ignore the long term consequences of what you're doing?
- panick21_ 5y agoWhat consequences. That you need a parking lot full of nuclear waste that just basically stands there and does nothing? Can we not spare a single tennis court sized storage facility? What are the consequences you are talking about? We are not talking about some absurd 300000 year storage facility build into the earths core. That is not needed. Guaranteeing something for 100 years is far easier then for 300000 years. And it can be easily monitored, if one location for some reason is a an issue after 100 years, just move it to another location.