3 ms·

To counter attack in case of possible attack from the West.

• avmich 5y ago
  What Putin actually considers casus belli isn't important for the moment - it could be anything, reasoned or not. Can we, here, present arguments that the desire of Russia to be able to attack neighbor countries should be honored? Do we extend MAD doctrine to non-nuclear matters - that is, everybody should refrain from defense, as defense reduces their neighbors' abilities to fight back in case those neighbors are attacked? Is it reasonable - for the moment - to think that countries, improving their defenses, actually offend neighbors?
• Valakas_ 5y ago
  Russia is a like an abusive man with PTSD - always expecting an attack that doesn't come and victimizing himself while abusing others. Has Russia perhaps thought for a moment why are countries making an alliance to defend against Russia? Why aren't countries in NATO worried about being attacked by other countries in NATO? Because *all the countries there don't want war*. NATO is not to attack Russia, but to defend against it. The idea of protecting against counter attack from the West is like saying "I can't leave my house to protect against the possibility of a meteorite against my head."
  • kelnos 5y ago
    > Has Russia perhaps thought for a moment why are countries making an alliance to defend against Russia? Yeah, there's a lot of rhetoric coming from Russia denouncing "NATO expansion". NATO isn't some belligerent expanding force, annexing territory; countries are actively asking to join NATO. Perhaps Russia should ask themselves why all these countries feel safer being aligned with NATO and the West than with Russia.
• throwaway894345 5y ago
  Why would the West ever attack Russia? The West doesn’t initiate aggression.