3 ms·

But as mentioned before, it's still mostly irrelevant. Even if the event happened, which can be possible. Blaming/Tying it to someone is a totally different th

But as mentioned before, it's still mostly irrelevant. Even if the event happened, which can be possible. Blaming/Tying it to someone is a totally different thing, that would require totally different proof. If the proof of the event already starts being doubtful within a couple of minutes of superficial checks. I don't think there is going to be anything left for tieing it to Faucci. --- This is literally what the creator of the Vera report says when asked about the conspiracy theory of deaths: > Tim Ross, a lead author of the Vera report, said in a phone interview that those suggesting the clinical trials were the cause of the 25 deaths were “completely misreading what we found.” > “Our report does not support that claim,” said Ross, now the managing partner of Action Research, a child welfare research group. He noted that children who participated in such trials were “incredibly sick” before the trials. Which seems pretty logical. People with aids then, didn't have the medical help they can have now.

TrispusAttucks 5y ago
I agree with your claim that placing the blame on Faucci for the AIDS scandal is unwarranted. I don't think the book makes that claim in its AIDS chapters, only that he was present during this alleged scandal. He is a large feature of the book (perhaps for marketing?) but it also covers the history of the government health institutions associated with regulating the pharmaceutical industry. The book is 400+ pages, too much content to summarize in a few comments on HN. I found it a fascinating read, you may as well or you may not.
- NicoJuicy 5y ago
  To be honest. The quick smell test failed on the thing that was mentioned primarily in the book intro. I would've expected much better of this example considering that. Checking those things constantly is exhausting on a human. We tend to get lost in the details and thereby forgetting the main issue. And I've got plenty of other things that I need to do, considering I also read HN ( = some procrastination :p ).

TrispusAttucks 5y ago

I agree with your claim that placing the blame on Faucci for the AIDS scandal is unwarranted. I don't think the book makes that claim in its AIDS chapters, only that he was present during this alleged scandal. He is a large feature of the book (perhaps for marketing?) but it also covers the history of the government health institutions associated with regulating the pharmaceutical industry. The book is 400+ pages, too much content to summarize in a few comments on HN. I found it a fascinating read, you may as well or you may not.

NicoJuicy 5y ago
To be honest. The quick smell test failed on the thing that was mentioned primarily in the book intro. I would've expected much better of this example considering that. Checking those things constantly is exhausting on a human. We tend to get lost in the details and thereby forgetting the main issue. And I've got plenty of other things that I need to do, considering I also read HN ( = some procrastination :p ).