3 ms·
Given that the number of tenure-track professor positions is so low, isn't this to be expected? What percentage of the top schools is needed to fill all the po
by albntomat0 5y ago
Given that the number of tenure-track professor positions is so low, isn't this to be expected?
What percentage of the top schools is needed to fill all the positions? Top 5%? Top 10%?
I'd be highly surprised if it the top 25% of schools were necessary to fill all spots.
- majormajor 5y agoYeah, given that there are more PhD-holding job candidates than their are faculty positions available in a given year, this is the expected result in two scenarios: 1) The scenario where signalling matters above all else. So there's too many highly-credentialed candidates for the openings at the institutions they graduated from, so they apply to jobs at lower-tier institutions. 2) The scenario where these institutions are producing truly better candidates and the interview process is robust. There's still too many great candidates for the "same-tier" positions, so they apply to lower-tier. This rules out a few scenarios such as: "the interview process is robust BUT these institutions produce no-better candidates" but it doesn't tell us much specifically about the interviewing process or the candidate quality because of the candidate pool size. A few interesting followup data points would be: 1) what ratio of graduates go into faculty positions for each tier of school. It must approach 0% at the lowest tier, but how quickly does it fall off? 2) what does industry hiring look like? Do you see a similar distribution, or are faculty positions preferred by enough PhDs that top-tier industry companies have to "settle for" a broader set of schools?