3 ms·
This is a ridiculous take in the context of the suit. It's internal, it wasn't used in any promotional/public material. Someone leaked it to him (most likely br
by dvt 5y ago
This is a ridiculous take in the context of the suit. It's internal, it wasn't used in any promotional/public material. Someone leaked it to him (most likely broke an NDA). Besides, I'm sure he's not the only "Carl Sagan" around, anyway.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- not2b 5y agoMacWeek published the code name.
- colechristensen 5y agoIt was obviously named for him and if it was actually internal only it wouldn’t have been known. I think of it like trying to protect a trademark, it’s fair to try to protect somebody from using your name, especially when the usage doesn’t have anything to do with fair use. A code name that you publicize with somebody’s name is using them as an unwilling participant in promoting your products.
- dvt 5y ago> It was obviously named for him and if it was actually internal only it wouldn’t have been known. Plenty of state secrets get leaked regularly, but you draw the line at funny internal product names?
- 8note 5y agoThat makes it seem like it's ok to give your employees counterfeit iphones, as long as they stay internal