3 ms·
I wouldn’t have been upset if they had introduced Podman alongside Docker as a choice, then replaced it when it was ready, but they didn’t. They pushed it hard
by chillfox 5y ago
I wouldn’t have been upset if they had introduced Podman alongside Docker as a choice, then replaced it when it was ready, but they didn’t. They pushed it hard as a replacement before it was anywhere close to production ready.
The way it was handled pretty much burned what remained of my trust in Redhat to the ground for me. Most of Redhats selling point is that it’s supposed to be stable and as dependable as a bag of hammers, except that’s a lie.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- vetinari 5y agoBut Docker was not ready and was causing problems. If it wasn't, there would be no point for Podman in the first place. Otherwise, it would delay development of RHEL for years (see the Cgroup v2 issue, for example). I'm no Redhat fan, but they do have point here. They are not the baddy here.