4 ms·

If you find this interesting you may want to check out the Best Seller "The Real Anthony Fauci" [1] by Rober F. Kennedy Jr. Your jaw will likely drop while read

If you find this interesting you may want to check out the Best Seller "The Real Anthony Fauci" [1] by Rober F. Kennedy Jr. Your jaw will likely drop while reading it. All the studies and source material is cited at the end of every chapter and you can review much of the clinical data and decide for yourself. [1] https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Childrens/dp/1510766804/ https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Children...

NicoJuicy 5y ago
The reviews are positive. I quickly looked at the author's personality and think it's a guy with the heart in a good place ( he had a role against Monsanto!), but a disturbed view of the world. I then looked at Faucci's response and he mentioned something similar as my first thoughts. I then looked at some of the examples and they are just wack and couldn't find proof of it. > Fauci repeatedly violated federal laws to allow his Pharma partners to use impoverished and dark-skinned children as lab rats in deadly experiments with toxic AIDS and cancer chemotherapies. It's a heated conspiracy book of a smart person of a well known family with a somewhat turbulent personal life, who benefits from funding money against anti-vaccine measures through his foundation. The difference is, that he's also trying to do good for the environment, which sounds kinda contradicting and hard to grasp for me. I've never seen that combination before.
- TrispusAttucks 5y ago
  The AIDS scandal is in the second half of the book. The first half is the COVID pandemic. The book goes backwards through time following Fauci's rise through government and involvement with the FDA, NIH, NIAID. The AIDS scandal you mentioned is well documented. The BBC aired a documentary on it known as the Guinea Pig Kids [0][1][2]. [0] https://web.archive.org/web/20070212002632/http://guineapigkids.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20070212002632/http://guineapigk... [1] https://www.democracynow.org/2004/12/22/guinea_pig_kids_how_new_york https://www.democracynow.org/2004/12/22/guinea_pig_kids_how_... [2] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_world/4038375.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_world/4038375.stm
  - NicoJuicy 5y ago
    I'm not disputing scandals can exist, uncorrelated to this specific case. I'm disputing direct correlation with Faucci, which is a very different proof to give and this reasoning is highly subjective and much abused with conspiracy theories. After quickly looking it up: https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-410618634223 https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-410618634223 https://www.snopes.com/news/2021/10/27/fauci-aids-drug-trial-on-kids/ https://www.snopes.com/news/2021/10/27/fauci-aids-drug-trial... Even here the so called proof by the author is misleading and this was just the first one i even bothered to look up. This was the main topic in the introduction of the book. I would expect better research instead of misleading one. Additionally, the first result on Google is literally the site of the author's foundation. Conspiracy theories are often based on far-fetched theories where the difference between truth and lies are misleading, similar to this example. --- I'm sorry, but this book didn't pass the smell test. Although I have to admit, it's a good attempt and it's been a while that I had to search for more than 5 minutes to be sure. Definitely because he actually seems to care about the environment, as mentioned before. --- One simple trick would be ( from my POV) that the more people are required to work together for a conspiracy-theory to be successfull. The less likely it is. Just look at the dozens of mistakes that are produced with one "unplanned live-show" orchestrated by a governement who prepared this for 8 years currently.
    - TrispusAttucks 5y ago
      I don't disagree, in part. Those links shared weren't from the book, just a quick search to show that its not a totally fabricated scandal. I will admit that there may be plenty of outrage, hyperbole, loose play with the facts in the book's AIDS chapters, but it does seem like a fact that (according to the book): Children of color in the New York foster system were experimented on with a toxic drug often against there will with dubious or missing consent and consent was often granted via the foster system for children that had no parents or guardians. That much is admitted outright and referenced in your links. The book does take it further and cover things that don't have official documentation and includes testimony of people who worked at the facilities. Just because there is no official documentation doesn't mean we should discount the the word of the people who worked there. Absolute Truth is indeed a tricky thing.

NicoJuicy 5y ago

The reviews are positive. I quickly looked at the author's personality and think it's a guy with the heart in a good place ( he had a role against Monsanto!), but a disturbed view of the world. I then looked at Faucci's response and he mentioned something similar as my first thoughts. I then looked at some of the examples and they are just wack and couldn't find proof of it. > Fauci repeatedly violated federal laws to allow his Pharma partners to use impoverished and dark-skinned children as lab rats in deadly experiments with toxic AIDS and cancer chemotherapies. It's a heated conspiracy book of a smart person of a well known family with a somewhat turbulent personal life, who benefits from funding money against anti-vaccine measures through his foundation. The difference is, that he's also trying to do good for the environment, which sounds kinda contradicting and hard to grasp for me. I've never seen that combination before.

TrispusAttucks 5y ago
The AIDS scandal is in the second half of the book. The first half is the COVID pandemic. The book goes backwards through time following Fauci's rise through government and involvement with the FDA, NIH, NIAID. The AIDS scandal you mentioned is well documented. The BBC aired a documentary on it known as the Guinea Pig Kids [0][1][2]. [0] https://web.archive.org/web/20070212002632/http://guineapigkids.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20070212002632/http://guineapigk... [1] https://www.democracynow.org/2004/12/22/guinea_pig_kids_how_new_york https://www.democracynow.org/2004/12/22/guinea_pig_kids_how_... [2] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_world/4038375.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_world/4038375.stm
- NicoJuicy 5y ago
  I'm not disputing scandals can exist, uncorrelated to this specific case. I'm disputing direct correlation with Faucci, which is a very different proof to give and this reasoning is highly subjective and much abused with conspiracy theories. After quickly looking it up: https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-410618634223 https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-410618634223 https://www.snopes.com/news/2021/10/27/fauci-aids-drug-trial-on-kids/ https://www.snopes.com/news/2021/10/27/fauci-aids-drug-trial... Even here the so called proof by the author is misleading and this was just the first one i even bothered to look up. This was the main topic in the introduction of the book. I would expect better research instead of misleading one. Additionally, the first result on Google is literally the site of the author's foundation. Conspiracy theories are often based on far-fetched theories where the difference between truth and lies are misleading, similar to this example. --- I'm sorry, but this book didn't pass the smell test. Although I have to admit, it's a good attempt and it's been a while that I had to search for more than 5 minutes to be sure. Definitely because he actually seems to care about the environment, as mentioned before. --- One simple trick would be ( from my POV) that the more people are required to work together for a conspiracy-theory to be successfull. The less likely it is. Just look at the dozens of mistakes that are produced with one "unplanned live-show" orchestrated by a governement who prepared this for 8 years currently.
  - TrispusAttucks 5y ago
    I don't disagree, in part. Those links shared weren't from the book, just a quick search to show that its not a totally fabricated scandal. I will admit that there may be plenty of outrage, hyperbole, loose play with the facts in the book's AIDS chapters, but it does seem like a fact that (according to the book): Children of color in the New York foster system were experimented on with a toxic drug often against there will with dubious or missing consent and consent was often granted via the foster system for children that had no parents or guardians. That much is admitted outright and referenced in your links. The book does take it further and cover things that don't have official documentation and includes testimony of people who worked at the facilities. Just because there is no official documentation doesn't mean we should discount the the word of the people who worked there. Absolute Truth is indeed a tricky thing.