4 ms·
If you can't reproduce those conditions in an artificial scenario setup to exaggerate the effect - how are they feasible ?
by moonchrome 5y ago
If you can't reproduce those conditions in an artificial scenario setup to exaggerate the effect - how are they feasible ?
- bluGill 5y agoThe question isn't can you reproduce it in an artificial setup, the question is can you do it in the real world? I can think of a lot of ways to cheat in the lab (turn the power to 11...) that create situations that in the real world wouldn't happen and so I wouldn't worry about it. However that doesn't change the fact that if you can recreate it in the real world I'm really worried.
- markmark 5y agoHere's the RCTA report where they reproduced those conditions and showed they were feasible: https://www.rtca.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/SC-239-5G-Interference-Assessment-Report_274-20-PMC-2073_accepted_changes.pdf https://www.rtca.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/SC-239-5G-In... The way you test this stuff is get a rad-alt and inject known amounts of RF and see how much is needed to give false readings. Then you go and measure how much RF you'll see in the environment and see if it exceeds those levels. Here's a choice quote from the summary: "In the worst case, the safe interference limit for the fundamental emissions is exceeded by over 47 dB, and the safe interference limit for the spurious emissions is exceeded by over 27 dB."