> Given that the data seem to suggest more code is written in Go, perhaps it's just that code is in general buggy and that is a hateful thing Maybe? I'm not co

> Given that the data seem to suggest more code is written in Go, perhaps it's just that code is in general buggy and that is a hateful thing Maybe? I'm not convinced. If that was the case, I assume that I would have seen someone accusing Rust of shooting them in the foot. Again, while Rust is my current favorite language, I make no claim that Rust is perfect by any metric. > but it means the language isn't getting in the way also. Probably? I don't practice go sufficiently to be a judge of that. I know that the Rust community would definitely assume that the compiler (or at least clippy, the standard linter) should get in the way of anything that is obviously (or not-so-obviously) going to cause a bug sooner or later.