3 ms·
Just because they created an OS and a character encoding does not mean that they are automatically good at creating programming languages.
by azth 5y ago
Just because they created an OS and a character encoding does not mean that they are automatically good at creating programming languages.
- philosopher1234 5y agonor did he say it did. the point of listing their credentials was to request a more sympathetic ear. if you're intent on seeing only the bad side of go, then no one will be able to convince you. taking a sympathetic perspective is required to truly understand the language and its utility.
- azth 5y agoI've used both in production settings, a sympathetic perspective doesn't help :)
- philosopher1234 5y agoAs have I, heavily, and it did.
- mfer 5y agoGo wasn't their first programming language. For example, one of them started the B language. Another one of them created Sawzall, a domain specific programming language. Have you looked at the history of the creators of Go? If not, I would suggest looking into it. 2 of the 3 have an amazing history in terms of computing.
- azth 5y agoI have, and it proves my argument. Limbo went nowhere when it was developed under AT&T for example.