17 ms·
You forgot the part that as an individual I am practically invisible to the institution, and it would take a mob of mes to attract Sauron's eye.
by btbuildem 5y ago
You forgot the part that as an individual I am practically invisible to the institution, and it would take a mob of mes to attract Sauron's eye.
- throw10920 5y agoIn a digital world, the Eye of Sauron is multi-threaded. (your statement isn't true when it comes to virtual + automated surveillance)
- daedlanth 5y agoMy dagger is multi threaded too.
- techdragon 5y agoIt’s also smaller than a gnat’s tooth in terms of practical power against them.
- AtlasBarfed 5y agoYes, the error in the metaphor is that the eye of sauron was one eye. Automated surveillance is millions of eyes that track, record, and calculate a billion times faster than the human eye.
- paulnpace 5y agoAnd it saves all observations forever for future review and analysis.
- superkuh 5y agoYou think that, until one day you wake up to the pounding of the FBI (or CSIS...) on your door at 6am. I thought I was a no one, I literally used the same Lotr metaphor as you, but in 2009/2010 during the occupy and wikileaks protests the US government must have decided I was enough (despite never going to a protest and commiting no crimes) and they raided me and ruined my life. I was never charged with a crime. Never even indicted. Their action was simply to ruin my life and scare me. It can happen to you too. Even if you think you're a no one.
- techdragon 5y agoYou don’t have to have committed a crime to be suspected of one. Investigation alone can be damaging enough depending on circumstances.
- btbuildem 5y agoAnd how did you attract their attention?
- TechBro8615 5y agoDo you mean to suggest that if you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear?
- btbuildem 5y agoNo, what I am suggesting is that as an "individual contributor" you're unlikely to merit an outlay of resources to do anything about your antics until your actions are somehow significant.
- wbsss4412 5y agoUnlikely implies non zero risk. Additionally, you’re making the fair strong assumption that the state has to expend more than a nominal amount of resources to crush you, when is it becoming easier and easier to do so without significant effort.