> That great, then you should have no trouble passing an actual Constitutional Amendment recognizing that right in a way that can't be interpreted away. I'll ju

> That great, then you should have no trouble passing an actual Constitutional Amendment recognizing that right in a way that can't be interpreted away. I'll just sit here and wait while you go and do that. Would be easy in a democracy Ergo the solution is rural voters count for much more than urban voters. > Naturally, the more rural states with smaller populations were concerned that their opinions and needs would be steamrolled by the more populous states What happened to respecting the wishes of fellow citizens? Why are these specific citizens more important because they live in a different plot of land? > Now, making those states' concerns appear rather prescient, quite a lot of modern urban progressives seem to want to renege on that promise, primarily because they think they can get away with it, and they hate those people anyways. Maybe its because the concept of losing a national election with millions more votes than the other side is bullshit? There are many divides in beliefs between people in the country. Geographical ones seem like the least interesting.