Exceptions have always supposed to be used rarely - that's the point! The most obvious example is 'new' failing and returning std::bad_alloc. Given that new is

Exceptions have always supposed to be used rarely - that's the point! The most obvious example is 'new' failing and returning std::bad_alloc. Given that new is implicit all over the place (pushing to a vector for example) the code would get very cluttered if you had to cope with this everywhere, so the pragmatic decision was taken to use exception handling to give apps that cared the chance to deal with them, and those that don't a sensible error message by default when the exception escapes main. It's interesting that the lack of enforced exception handling was seen as a strength when exceptions were added to the language, compared to now when the lack of enforced exception handling is sometimes seen as a weakness. Programming language design and expectations are a moving target, so it'll be interesting to see how these things develop over time. And yes, Rust and Go take a different approach. Is there right and wrong? No, i'd say just different approaches which will play to the strengths of some problem domains and coding styles.