>conflating rate-limiting with input monitoring when I have been unequivocably stating the distinction between the two as soon as the "zinger" accusation was fi

>conflating rate-limiting with input monitoring when I have been unequivocably stating the distinction between the two as soon as the "zinger" accusation was first made. What you are doing here is making that esoteric assumption that their rate limiting is being triggered by _how fast the user is typing_ and then writing essay after essay about how inappropriate it is. Nobody has provably stated that 'Facebook’s systems determined that you were going too fast when taking an action.' refers to typing cadence instead of frequency of replies. That point needs to be proven before being discussed. Please back up your assumption if you wish it to be discussed. Few people want to waste their life discussing paranoid fantasies.