3 ms·
> It's more focused on aggravating offenses The relevant part is not about aggravating circumstances of other crimes. It's about private speech, and it is qui
by cryptonector 5y ago
> It's more focused on aggravating offenses
The relevant part is not about aggravating circumstances of other crimes. It's about private speech, and it is quite broadly defined. Broadly defined == it will be abused.
- mikeyouse 5y agoI guess we'll see? It doesn't actually read like it's that broadly defined -- they explicitly allow e.g. ridiculing religion and trying to get people to stop practicing their faith and it requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt which is a fine antidote for bad laws if you believe most people are reasonable. It's been ~a year with no controversial applications yet so perhaps it's fine?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]