3 ms·
If you listen to the next question, it seems like he was talking about people in the U.S. donating to the movement.
by pkd 5y ago
If you listen to the next question, it seems like he was talking about people in the U.S. donating to the movement.
- daenz 5y agoWhich is strange if that is the case because they have no jurisdiction to make any kind of veiled threats towards U.S. citizens.
- telephone2 5y agoThe whole point was controlling points of access for international funds (ie. the GoFundMe, GiveSendGo, crypto).
- Mountain_Skies 5y agoThey could ban those donors from ever entering Canada but that's about it. If they successfully pull off equating the truckers with terrorists, then they could request the US extradite them but that's pretty far fetched. Then again, pretty much everything they've done has been far fetched so who knows what they'll try next.
- catgary 5y agoI mean, Canada has jurisdiction over whether or not they can enter Canada, do business in Canada, freeze assets in Canadian banks, etc.
- busymom0 5y agoWhy would he be talking about US people? He has zero jurisdiction over that. And even if he were talking about US people, that still wouldn't make such comments okay. Canadians donate to US protests all the time and vice versa. Plus, the Deputy Director of Intelligence for Canada's financial intel agency (FINTRAC) said there is no evidence of suspicious transactions around the freedom convoy: https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/no-spike-in-suspicious-transaction-reporting-amid-trucker-convoy-protests-financial-intelligence-expert-1.5776170 https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/no-spike-in-suspicious-trans... So what exactly is his point?
- catgary 5y agoOf course he has jurisdiction over that - Canadians don’t have jurisdiction over drunk driving in the US, but if you have a DUI you’re going to have a tough time getting into Canada.