>She is “willing to work with all people regardless of race, creed, sexual orientation, and gender,” her lawyers told the court. “But she cannot create websites

>She is “willing to work with all people regardless of race, creed, sexual orientation, and gender,” her lawyers told the court. “But she cannot create websites that promote messages contrary to her faith, such as messages that condone violence or promote sexual immorality, abortion, or same-sex marriage.” Seems like an open-and-shut case. She’s willing to work with gays, just not for this particular cause. Is this any different than turning away a white for wanting a KKK website? I think not.