6 ms·
Am I missing something or is the final source for the caravel user project missing? I cannot find it here: https://efabless.com/projects/shuttle_name/MPW-1 htt
by kop316 5y ago
Am I missing something or is the final source for the caravel user project missing?
I cannot find it here:
https://efabless.com/projects/shuttle_name/MPW-1 https://efabless.com/projects/shuttle_name/MPW-1
Nor here (since I think it is by efabless?)
https://github.com/orgs/efabless/repositories https://github.com/orgs/efabless/repositories
- marcan_42 5y agoIsn't it this one? https://efabless.com/projects/33 https://efabless.com/projects/33
- kop316 5y agoI thought so too, but look at the picture in it versus in the link: https://groupgets-files.s3.amazonaws.com/Efabless/open-source-logo-on-caravel-min.jpg https://groupgets-files.s3.amazonaws.com/Efabless/open-sourc... They are different. Also, if you go to https://vlsicad.ucsd.edu/Publications/Conferences/383/c383.pdf https://vlsicad.ucsd.edu/Publications/Conferences/383/c383.p... Figure 6: You can find the image from the link (top left), and the on ehtat you linked (bottom left), so they are two different projects.
- marcan_42 5y agoI get the feeling the image from the link might just be wrong, though. It has 3 identical blocks in the user logic area. That doesn't fit the 8x8 FPGA story. There's no factor of 3 there. Maybe they just used a random example built on the same platform? Edit: yup, they just picked a pretty picture they had of what was apparently the first design in MPW1. You can browse it here: https://siliconpr0n.org/map/gsky/mpw1-00010001/mz_mit10x/ https://siliconpr0n.org/map/gsky/mpw1-00010001/mz_mit10x/ Almost certainly not the actual FPGA design.
- kop316 5y agoI mean...in my mind, that raises more questions. All of the "Additional Cool stuff" to be implies that it was fabbed out on mpw-1 and they have tested it. Why take a random image then if you have die shots or a picture of the GDS? Then again, the low power consumption picture looks to be measuring the SPI flash? that is far too little pins for the FPGA.
- commandpaul 5y agoThe chip ignite path does not require designs to be published, unlike the Google sponsored MPWx tapeouts.
- kop316 5y agoI get that, but the link literally says: "The Open Source FPGA ASIC". With that in the title, I would expect to be able to find the source of the FPGA.
- snvzz 5y agoRequired or not, it is desirable.
- krasin 5y agoMy guess would be that the first prototype that they made was too buggy to publish. The promise is that they will share the final design, and I am fine with that. (I am not affiliated with the project, but backed it)
- krasin 5y agoUpdate: marcan_42 apparently found it: https://efabless.com/projects/33 https://efabless.com/projects/33
- kop316 5y agoI don't think they are the same: Look at the picture in it versus in the link: https://groupgets-files.s3.amazonaws.com/Efabless/open-source-logo-on-caravel-min.jpg https://groupgets-files.s3.amazonaws.com/Efabless/open-sourc... They are different. Also, if you go to https://vlsicad.ucsd.edu/Publications/Conferences/383/c383.pdf https://vlsicad.ucsd.edu/Publications/Conferences/383/c383.p... Figure 6: You can find the image from the link (top left), and the on ehtat you linked (bottom left), so they are two different projects.
- kop316 5y ago