3 ms·
I wonder if part of it is horribly cheap flash storage used in smart TVs, after a bunch of update cycles, telemetry upload/downloads, etc. etc. I wouldn't be su
by scohesc 5y ago
I wonder if part of it is horribly cheap flash storage used in smart TVs, after a bunch of update cycles, telemetry upload/downloads, etc. etc. I wouldn't be surprised if the flash chips might be wearing out and take longer to read/write to.
That or the TV companies are intentionally making previous TVs slower with updates they know old TVs can't run with any modicum of speed.
- sbcd 5y ago> I wouldn't be surprised if the flash chips might be wearing out and take longer to read/write to. This is what happened to the Nexus 7 tablets, I owned one and the experience, which was great at first, became terrible over time. Smart TVs are a mistake, unfortunately most (maybe all current productions) are smart TVs nowadays. TVs are something that can last a long while - I kept my old dumb TV for 10 years before the backlight became too dark for my liking -, smart components on the other hand.. plus, it's not like it's a huge inconvenience or extra expense to add something like a chromecast or fire tv to get literally the same experience the smart components provide, except that this time, if the stick dies, you don't have to replace the whole tv.