3 ms·
That would turn communicating between threads into communicating between VMs, which is a disastrous change in itself.
by CyberDildonics 5y ago
That would turn communicating between threads into communicating between VMs, which is a disastrous change in itself.
- tjungblut 5y agohow do you know the threads need to communicate with each other?
- CyberDildonics 5y agoHow do you know they don't?
- gpderetta 5y agoIt would. On the other hand multiprocessing with explicitly shared memory could be a fast (but potentially painful) workaround.
- CyberDildonics 5y agoThat could make sense for processes, which would also get around the exception unwind lock, but I don't know how that would work with every thread moved into a separate VM.
- gpderetta 5y agoOf course. Using VMs here would very deep into overengineering territory.