2 ms·
Indeed, the wording is confusing. If he "is the first two" then he "is a good governor". So with a more generous reading, you must be referring to the second
by wyldfire 5y ago
Indeed, the wording is confusing. If he "is the first two" then he "is a good governor". So with a more generous reading, you must be referring to the second clauses of each of the first two.
- duxup 5y agoTY, yeah that doesn't make sense now. I kinda meant to indicate the last trumps the good parts of the first but I agree that does seem confusing.