2 ms·
The more structural obstacles there are to pushing out patches, the fewer patches will be pushed out. The company would have an incentive to rigorously test the
by whoknew1122 5y ago
The more structural obstacles there are to pushing out patches, the fewer patches will be pushed out. The company would have an incentive to rigorously test the patches before sending them out.
Currently, with OTA patches, you can throw out any patch you want because it's self-serve. But if customers were inconvenienced by having to go to a service center for an update, Tesla would have a larger incentive to get things right the first time. It would damage their brand reputation if a customer had to go to a service center for a patch and then turn around and schedule two more appointments to download bugfix patches.
- throwaway894345 5y agoAh, the old "make it harder for customers to install safety updates" argument. > The company would have an incentive to rigorously test the patches before sending them out. This doesn't stop traditional automotive companies from releasing buggy software (they have far more recalls per unit time than Tesla), and anyway the issue you noted above wasn't a bug, it was a perfectly safe _optional_ feature that NHTSA didn't like.