3 ms·
You've slightly overstated your case. I was on board for someone to counter GPs post but it's not you. 1. A "giant ass" isn't pornographic per se. 2. "Extremi
by andybak 5y ago
You've slightly overstated your case. I was on board for someone to counter GPs post but it's not you.
1. A "giant ass" isn't pornographic per se.
2. "Extremist" is a weird way to put it.
- _dain_ 5y ago>1. A "giant ass" isn't pornographic per se. I am being charitable and assuming it is indeed a sexualized/objectified/pornographic pic of a giant ass, i.e. that OP isn't being disingenous >2. "Extremist" is a weird way to put it. "showing porn to kids is Good Actually" is an extremist view. if you polled people it would be a fringe opinion, and most would regard it as an abhorrent idea.
- rosndo 5y ago> "showing porn to kids is Good Actually" is an extremist view. if you polled people it would be a fringe opinion, and most would regard it as an abhorrent idea. Nobody is arguing this. Why construct strange strawmen? Working this hard to prevent your kids from seeing nudity is weird, end of story.
- andybak 5y ago> sexualized/objectified/pornographic One of those things is not the same as the others.