> why not call it "sanctioned racism"? You should. The media won't, because it now becomes a loaded term. You can make fun of "reverse" racism, but not "sancti

> why not call it "sanctioned racism"? You should. The media won't, because it now becomes a loaded term. You can make fun of "reverse" racism, but not "sanctioned" racism. Sometimes I wonder whose side these so-called centrist/neutral or even expressly right-wing publications are on because they often present the weakest argument in favor of an issue that is all but ready for opponents to demolish.