> As the article hints at, our view of pre-marital sex has never been more positive. Depends how you define "positive": Sure, it's not so much condemned on pur

> As the article hints at, our view of pre-marital sex has never been more positive. Depends how you define "positive": Sure, it's not so much condemned on puritanical grounds any more (at least not openly). But if many of the kinds of (i.e. young, single) people who used to have lots of it are now all "meh" about it, then that's not much of a "positive view", now is it?