4 ms·
NYTimes is just a paywall. There are a few of these. Flagging them as credential_walls or pay_walls would be cool.
by baash05 5y ago
NYTimes is just a paywall. There are a few of these.
Flagging them as credential_walls or pay_walls would be cool.
- dazc 5y agoLinking from HN to paywalled sites does nothing to discourage such site's behaviour. Fine, if you want a paywalled internet just don't suck the life out of the open version. It's a common complaint that decent websites don't get surfaced on Google - well given so many valuable links are going to cloaked sites such as NYT, it's no wonder?
- beardyw 5y agoSomeone will mostly put an archive link in the comments. Some of those stories are valuable.
- whyoh 5y agoFlagging would be better than nothing, I guess. But it's not enough IMO. My main problem with Twitter is the UI, which is bad in general and terrible for long posts (threads). The second problem is the "culture" of posting outrage and low quality content in general, often full of typos (due to Twitter being a mobile-centric platform). Requiring credentials is just the last straw. So I think a stronger deterrent is needed. If not a ban, lowering the score for Twitter-link submissions (each vote counts 0.5 votes)?
- ziml77 5y agoI do not want content missing out on page 1 simply because it's on Twitter. That content may not be available elsewhere, meaning that people are very likely to miss useful and informative posts. And it's not like a vote bias on HN is going to make those people move off of Twitter. Either use an extension to redirect you to a site like nitter.net, manually adjust the URL yourself, or just don't click on Twitter links at all.