My apologies, the number I gave was the number of doses given, total number of fully vaccinated people is 4.32B. Each dose is a sample because each dose is a ch

My apologies, the number I gave was the number of doses given, total number of fully vaccinated people is 4.32B. Each dose is a sample because each dose is a chance for something to go wrong, right? Anyways, the way I stated it was wrong, so nice catch. Looking at it either way, a sample size of 4.32 billion people or 10+ billion individual doses is more than enough to give a very clear signal if the vaccines were causing harm; harm from the vaccines would be as obvious as the sun, statistically speaking. > ...the conflicting (and often suppressed) research... What "research" regarding covid vaccine efficacy is being "suppressed", exactly? The only research that I see being suppressed, is the research that the vast majority of people that are dying of covid are unvaccinated. And it's being suppressed by the cruel FUD campaign led by the anti-vaxer crew, that, tragically, has taken so many of their own number. I don't see much "conflicting research" regarding vaccine efficacy at all, it's well below the standard level of noise you get from medical studies. For instance, have you seen any reputable studies that point to unvaccinated people dying less often than vaccinated people of covid? Me neither. We know the vaccines provide significant protection from serious complications from covid, including death, we know the protection wanes over time, and we know boosters are extremely effective. Where exactly is the uncertainly here?