3 ms·
Not really a valid argument. We survived millennia without a lot of things. The Industrial Revolution was only two centuries ago. It doesn't mean life was neces
by colejohnson66 5y ago
Not really a valid argument. We survived millennia without a lot of things. The Industrial Revolution was only two centuries ago. It doesn't mean life was necessarily better before then.
- TedDoesntTalk 5y agoTrue. What I’m trying to say is that Twitter in a block chain would probably be an awful user experience.
- brk 5y agoTwitter could be improved by requiring a proof of work effort before posting any tweets. The effort could be computational, or just proof of fact checking and basic proofreading would go a long way.
- auntienomen 5y ago"Proof of thought"
- CyberDildonics 5y agoTwitter is already an awful user experience.
- ssivark 5y agoOTOH -- Twitter (on the blockchain) supporting only ~10 tweets per second is a blessing in disguise that would drastically help improve the user experience by imposing a high cost on junk :P
- cuteboy19 5y agoPeople would get into bidding wars for the next tweet
- parineum 5y agoImagine a platform where tweets were so expensive only the rich could speak!
- jakupovic 5y agoOr similarly a world where one pays to read tweets.
- Daviey 5y ago~$0.001 USD is the current cost for gas on Polygon for a transaction. If people have to pay credits to tweet (even this little), I would expect the quality to increase.
- parineum 5y agoHow will being attached to something as valuable as speech change the value of that?