4 ms·
Two quick examples would be the left party consider the secret mass surveillance by government entities to be wrong on multiple levels and is continuously criti
by Y-bar 5y ago
Two quick examples would be the left party consider the secret mass surveillance by government entities to be wrong on multiple levels and is continuously criticising the government for it. Another would be that the same group of parties consider the government being too slow to implement carbon taxation and other measures to prevent further damages due to climate change.
- Chris2048 5y agoI mean the original ones, that you consider right-wing.
- Y-bar 5y agoIt's a continuation of the thread started by OP: > [...] ineffectual administration [...] Those two words are verbatim what our right-wing parties use to describe the EU as a whole, especially when arguing why we should do our own Brexit and leave the union because we are better on our own.
- Chris2048 5y agoBut that's the phraseology. You specifically mentioned reasons / attitudes. If this is another "dog whistle" argument, I think you need far more evidence before you smear another user what you assume their motivations are; It's possible to use terminology borrowed from right-wing parties, language is free to use - and ThalesX has explicitly stated their position.
- Y-bar 5y agoCare to clarify your question?
- Chris2048 5y agoWhat specifically leads you to believe ThalesX has nationalistic/right-wing reasons/attitudes other than the wording of that one phrase he used.
- Y-bar 5y agoNothing makes me believe that, why would I do that? That's why I ask you to clarify your question, it does not make sense from my point of view.
- Chris2048 5y agoYou said, in response to ThakesX, who was complaining about people interpreting his attitude as a nationalist one: Why should we stop? Where I live (NW Europe) this sentiment.. What "sentiment" are you referring to, that you don't believe you should stop interpreting as right-wing/nationalist.