4 ms·
The problem here is there is no difference to the victim. They were promised money the hiring party did not have and did not deliver. From the worker's viewpoin
by TigeriusKirk 5y ago
The problem here is there is no difference to the victim. They were promised money the hiring party did not have and did not deliver. From the worker's viewpoint, they've been cheated of their wages regardless of intent.
- hammock 5y agoWhat money were they promised? The article I read said they were hired on commission and zero clients were won.
- lolinder 5y agoa) As others have already told you and the article calls out, you can't hire someone for $0 under UK law, even if you offer commission. b) The employees were all told they would get a salary and many were told they would get sponsored for a visa. Ali did not have the means to follow through with those promises.