<q>If there's a substantive comment to be made about that historical parallel, it would look very different from what you posted.</p> Given that you seem to ha

<q>If there's a substantive comment to be made about that historical parallel, it would look very different from what you posted.</p> Given that you seem to have the authoritative editorial position on these comments, can you give us an example of what you might consider substantive in this particular case? So that we, in the peanut gallery, could have something to go on when crafting our responses? We're not mind readers.