3 ms·
I don't think that changes anything other than making the need for collective bargaining even more important. Those providing the essential services deserve eve
by arcticbull 5y ago
I don't think that changes anything other than making the need for collective bargaining even more important. Those providing the essential services deserve every bit as much representation as those providing non-essential service. Especially since their employer has even more power.
- s1artibartfast 5y agoBut the taxpayer owners have less power. Seems like a bad system IMHO as a tax payer.
- arcticbull 5y agoOf course the group who stands to be pushed back on would view it as a "bad system." Just as most employers view unions as a "bad system" however, they have numerous real-world benefits.
- s1artibartfast 5y agoYeah, and numerous real-world costs. Reasonable people can still disagree on the priority and balancing of these costs and benefits as there is rarely a factually correct answer.