4 ms·
It’s a charity thing. We want to be charitable, we don’t want to assume the worst, we want to assume they can learn, be better, without the maximal social punis
by techdragon 5y ago
It’s a charity thing. We want to be charitable, we don’t want to assume the worst, we want to assume they can learn, be better, without the maximal social punishment that would likely ensue from naming them publicly…
At least that’s the positive angle. The negative one is they are some kind of scumbag with enough leverage to keep their ass covered and picked a fight they thought they could win, but didn’t win enough to avoid consequences, just not public consequences.