This is a very interesting legal document, and I'll have to take the time to read it slowly before I can judge it. It centers around this line: ... not PD

This is a very interesting legal document, and I'll have to take the time to read it slowly before I can judge it. It centers around this line: ... not PD for you, can become PD when you give it to someone else and claims that, as this potentiality can always be fulfilled, you should consider it PD. This would invalidate the first part of the post, but is still not enough to make a default deploy of a logging http server illegal because of the 6.1(f) legitimate intrest rule. In fact, things like 21.1(b) might make it obligatory. Now we are in lawyer 'interesting question' territory which costs a lot of money, and I still don't think you'll need to worry, because you're not violating the spirit of the law. Personally, I'll go on depending on 2.2(c)