> In short, this is just the usual mainstream media pandering. Pandering to whom? I'd agree that it's a mostly a standard list, but I was surprised to find it

> In short, this is just the usual mainstream media pandering. Pandering to whom? I'd agree that it's a mostly a standard list, but I was surprised to find it in mainstream publication. I was impressed that the list was presented seemingly accurately and without much condescension. I felt that it was actually intended to explain why (some) anti-vaxxers act they way they do, rather than to make the audience feel superior. Along with recent NYT article like this one (https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/health/covid-cdc-data.html https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/health/covid-cdc-data.htm...) I get the sense that there is a change in the media landscape that allows these articles to be published now.