> In the beginning, there was HTML, and it was good. No, it's really not. It is excessively verbose for human usage, and too loose for computer usage. It's a

> In the beginning, there was HTML, and it was good. No, it's really not. It is excessively verbose for human usage, and too loose for computer usage. It's a hack. For human usage, Markdown is pretty decent. For computer usage, an S-expression–based HTML would have been preferable: (html (head (title "Hello world!") (meta ((http-equiv content-type) (content text/html) (charset utf-8)))) (body ((bgcolor white)) (h1 "Hello world!") (p "This is my first webpage.")))